Thoughts on Justin Cronin’s The Passage

by sj

I’m starting writing this now, before I’m even done with the book because I have a lot of things I want to talk about before I forget.  I don’t think this will even end up being a review at all, which is why I’m not titling it as such.

Listen.  This book…if you follow me on twitter or are my friend on GoodReads, you’ll know I’ve been struggling with this book.  It’s not because it’s terrible, because it’s not.  It’s more that I feel like it has a lot of unfulfilled potential.

David asked me on one of my gr status updates if I thought it might be my editorial eye that made me more willing to continue, because I was able to sift through what was and wasn’t working.  The more I think about this, the more I realize that he’s right.

The Passage could have been brilliant.  The problem here is either that Cronin’s editors and publisher let him down, or he let himself down by trying to fit TOO DAMN MUCH into the almost 800 pages of this book (and, actually, my ebook is over 800 pages, which is one of the reasons it’s so daunting).

It seems that lately, in the publishing biz, trilogies are the thing.  Forget the lengthy sagas or (god forbid) the standalone novel, no one wants those anymore.  Three books and tap out.  Maybe I’m wrong, but it seems like that’s the current trend, and I think it’s detrimental to authors AND readers.

I know I’m in the minority with regards to this book (although the further I get, the more people I hear from who say they either gave up on this one, or WISH they had), but I don’t think I’d have struggled as hard to get through it, had this first book been broken into two or three novels, instead of one giant Epic Train Wreck.

Because when it comes down to it, that’s what this book feels like.  We aren’t given enough time to acclimate to one group of characters before we’re moving on because they’re all dead.  What the hell?  What was the point of learning 50 names if NONE OF THEM are important, after all?

If this book had been split up, we’d have had a chance to get to actually KNOW AND CARE ABOUT these characters so that the inevitable deaths meant something to us.

Conversely, if some of the irrelevant things that don’t actually end up meaning anything had been removed, this book could have been cut down to a much more manageable 400-500 pages, and it would have been so much better for it.

~o~

So, I just finished.  All of that up there is totally irrelevant now because I’m pissed.  That was the stupidest book, and I can’t believe I wasted my time.  Even up through the last 15 pages, I was thinking “You know, if the second book is better, maybe I’ll give it a chance.”

Now I’m just mad and wishing I had a physical copy of this book to burn.  Ugh.

~o~

SO.  That first part is what happens when I start talking about a book I haven’t finished.  The second part is what happens when I finish a book and start writing about it while I’m still SO ANGRY ZOMG.

I’ve had several hours to cool off, and while I’m still angry, I’m not all capattack and sweary like I was when I finished yesterday.

This was me when I finished reading (Heather D, avert your eyes):

Am I still mad?  Yes.  Do I hate this book with every fibre of my being?  No, that’s reserved for the work of Chuck Palahniuk, thank you very much.

HOWEVER.  I guess I just don’t get it.  I don’t understand how this was, like, the most TALKED ABOUT BOOK of 2010 (which is probably why I avoided reading it until now), I don’t understand why the majority of the ratings and reviews I’ve seen are so positive.

As I said above in that crossed out part, this book COULD HAVE BEEN so excellent.  I kept noticing little parts that would give me shivers and parts that were just so well written, I could ALMOST see what everyone was raving about.

The majority of the book, though (at least 75%) was confusing, boring, and really in need of both paring down AND fleshing out.

So, I’m asking.  I need those of you that have loved this book to explain why.

(DO NOT tell me that it’s because it’s just like The Stand.  I will be very tempted to call you a liar.  I’ve read The Stand many times, and the only similarity between Cronin and King is that they both need to let their editors do their effing jobs.)

 

27 Responses to “Thoughts on Justin Cronin’s The Passage”

  1. Sigh. I have more weeks of reading (since I’m reading on a schedule) — I really shouldn’t have read this.

    I have some problems with it so far–we’ve discussed them a little on Twitter. It sounds like the problems will get worse. Sigh.

    • I don’t want to be THAT GUY. I kept getting conflicting reports “the beginning is slow, but it gets better,” and “the beginning was the best part, just give up.”

      So, it’s pretty polarizing, don’t let my opinion sway you (but keep me posted on your thoughts!).

  2. I worked with Justin Cronin some years ago. I was in a private advanced fiction workshop he used to run out of his dining room. He had to quit doing it when he got the deal for this trilogy. Part of the hype about these books, I believe, is that the numbers on the deal were astronomical and that Ridley Scott’s movie production company had already optioned it before the book was even finished. Cronin is a talented author — read his linked short story collection Mary and O’Neill for proof of that, if you like literary fiction. And he was an absolutely excellent teacher.

    But I didn’t read The Passage, and I like vampires. I don’t personally care for apocalyptic literature — in fact, Good Omens was about the only book of its ilk I ever enjoyed — and so when he told us about the premise of the trilogy on our last night of the workshop, I was no longer excited about the project. I heard him read a chapter from the first book at a reading where he was one of the two features when he was starting to promote it. And I thought it was generally good — by which I mean that in just listening to him read the chapter I could detect the hallmarks of technically astute writing.

    But it didn’t make me want to read it.

    The review Alan Cheuse gave of it on NPR when it came out blew me away.

    Ah well.

    • I think part of what was SO frustrating about it was being able to see what could have been, if it had just been handled differently.

      Lori of TNBBC’s review (I’m on my phone, or I’d link) had suggestions for how this could have been broken up into 3 or 4 separate books (just this first volume, mind) and it would have been SO MUCH better.

      It makes me sad to know that it could have been truly great, but was just a let down instead.

  3. Well pisser, that was a waste of time huh? I don’t dig vampires much so I’ll be skipping this one. I don’t want my head to blow off either ;) Take a deep breath, have a glass of booze and read something you love. <~~Dr. Jen's prescription for getting over a shitty book

    • Heh. I was super close to drinking last night, just to wash away the bad taste this book left in my mouth – but my husband had to work early today, so instead I just went to bed before 1 and tried to concentrate on something else instead of ranting in my head.

  4. My eyes! My eyes! Near as I can tell through these burning orbs, you really loved that book.:-P

  5. Aww..I just ordered this book today..

  6. I loved it. Thing is, I DON’T REMEMBER WHY. It was years ago and I wasn’t taking notes on my books then and I have the memory of a goldfish when I don’t write something down. I wish I could remember so I could tell you!

    • I think if I were a slower reader, it would have bothered me even more than it did. I wish you could remember, but I’m not going to force you to read it again. ;)

  7. As you know, I liked it, and I have never read The Stand. So, I can’t compare. It struck a cord with me because I am familiar with its locales. I’ve been to the Memphis Zoo a bunch of times and could picture it. Also, I read the book while traveling through the southwest and could literally look at the landscape as I was reading.

    Dystopian tales interest me and placing the story in places that I knew added to this interest. On top of that, I thought it was a cool idea.

  8. I didn’t LOVE it, but I liked the ideas behind the story enough to get through the more tedious parts of the novel. I agree, though, it could have been a LOT better with some more ruthless editing.

  9. Now I get the tweet about too many crossouts… ha.

  10. {I should probably put a spoiler alert here, even though it’s not particularly detailed.]
    So I’ve struggled with framing what I like about The Passage.
    I asked my partner and she said merely that she found the characters compelling, wanted to know what was happening next all through the story and just plain liked it.
    I concur in that I adored some of the characters, and those I didn’t like were still compelling in their own way. As were all the story elements. I struggled through the military parts, but I felt like it was all there for a reason.
    I guess it all felt very real to me. Like Cronin has taken a couple of ideas (vampires and apocalypse), and combined the two into new and interesting combinations. I could really tell he’d put a lot of thought into framing the world, the characters – a lot of thought into how people would react given those circumstances, all of them. From the scientists who discovered the virus and naturally thought to use it for military gain and test it on prisoners, to the colonies who barricaded themselves away from everything in order to survive.
    I found all the little aspects fascinating. Why did the virals travel in threes? What exactly was the deal with Amy and the animals even before? There are so many unanswered questions so I’m really hoping some of them get addressed in the sequel, but for me that adds to the complexity of the story, it doesn’t detract.
    I didn’t mind that we got invested in characters that got killed off. That’s life. I guess that’s what I mean when I say it feels real to me.
    And I think there are definitely parallels to The Stand but that’s not why I liked The Passage. I’d almost go so far as to say I preferred The Passage because it dealt with similar topics but without the overt religiosity. But it’s been a long time since I read The Stand, so I won’t set that in stone.
    But like I said on twitter maybe what it all boils down to is that I’m easier to please?

Trackbacks

Comments make us happy. Leave lots of comments. Just don't be a snapebag or you'll face the wrath of dodisharkicorn and your comment will be deleted. Or we'll make fun of you. Or both. Probably both.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,045 other followers

%d bloggers like this: