“I’m sorry for you, Charlie.”

by sj

rageToday’s title is something Susan Brooks says to our protagonist (?) Charlie Decker towards the end of Richard Bachman/Stephen King’s Rage.

That one little line of dialogue does an incredibly accurate job of summing up my feelings for this book.  I felt/feel sorry for Charlie.

Charlie, whose father is just an asshole.  Charlie, whose mother is…not entirely there.  Charlie, who has a best friend I spend each re-read wondering if he’s entirely real, or just a coping mechanism for Charlie.  That last sentence probably doesn’t make much sense outside of my head, but trust me – if you were in here, you’d get it.

Anyway, as most of you probably know – Rage isn’t in print anymore (go read Heather’s post about it where she talks about why), and while I can’t say that I agree with the decision to pull this book, I can understand it.

Violence in schools is a rather sticky subject, and if Unky Steve was concerned about the teen shooters using this as a sort of rallying cry, I don’t blame him for having it pulled.

My problem with this book not being available anymore is that this is really another example of King showing that he knows EXACTLY what it’s like to be a teenager.  I know he started writing it when he was young, and it was still published when he was relatively young, but the voice he gives to his younger characters rings just as true now as it did then.

Being a teenager sucks.  There’s not really any way to argue that.  Being a misunderstood, unpopular teenager is even worse.  I think the hardest part for me when reading this was that I can totally understand what pushed Charlie to the point where he felt his only recourse was violence.  Don’t get me wrong, I never would have taken a gun to school, or beat a teacher within an inch of his life, but that’s probably because it wasn’t the establishment that I had my issues with.

This is all making me sound highly unstable, and that’s not my point.  My point is that while this is not a choice I would have made for myself, I can kind of understand how one would get to the point of making such a decision.  This is why it’s so imperative that we make sure our children know they have a safe place to vent, to get out their rage against this unjust teenage hell they’re trapped in for what seems like an eternity.

…I don’t know.  I’ve kind of already forgotten where I was going with this.

I think this is one of those books that some people will love, some people will despise because they can’t see past the violence, and that others will hate because it takes them back to being that outcast 16 year old they were years ago.  I fall into that final category, if you were wondering.  I love this book, but I hate it at the same time.  I don’t like being 16 again.

all the sk big

YoRWtFIW

49 Responses to ““I’m sorry for you, Charlie.””

  1. I passed this book up a a thrift store the other day. I wish I hadn’t. I had no idea how hard it would be to find, or how expensive.

  2. I saw just the title of this on Twitter, and I got all verklempt because I knew exactly what it was.. and I could hear Susan Brooks in my brain.

    I love this book, I don’t really care what that says about me. (Obviously, I am not a violent person, so.)

  3. I haven’t re-read Rage in a long time, but I will one of these days. I have no idea how I’ll feel about it, though. The book definitely creates some complex emotions for anyone who still distinctly remembers being that outcast 16 year old, like you say.

  4. I was in my 40s when I first read Rage, and I reacted a lot like you did. Even though I would have never done what Charlie did, I could completely understand what brought him to that point. I think that might be the biggest problem when trying to process school violence. Nobody wants to admit that they understand a teenager getting to the last spoon in the drawer. Much simpler to call them EVIL and move on.

    • That’s what I find so difficult about these situations. It’s so easy to just condemn, but I think that MOST of us have been close to that tipping point at some time in our lives.

  5. Very well said. I didn’t say so in my review because I had so many things to say and I knew I didn’t have the space to say it all, but I really liked this book. I had all the sympathy for Charlie…and I had quite a bit of sympathy for Ted, too, but I’m not sure why. I hate what happened to him at the end, but he was an asshole, too. I don’t know. All of my conflicting feelings about the story stem from the Ted parts.

    I love so much the second to last paragraph when he says that having even a small secret like his disdain for custard(?) makes him feel human again. It’s obvious pretty early on in the book that Charlie recognizes he’s probably going to feel a bit of remorse about his choices that day, but that paragraph about secrets and his inability to get Ted’s stained hands out of his head really say it all.

  6. Ya’ll are making me want to read this! I’m bummed that it’s not in print. Hmmm..wonder if I can find it at my local library? Off to search…

    Ho ho ho! I found it through my interlibrary loan program. Woot! It’s a collection of his early stuff including: Rage — The long walk — Roadwork — The running man

    Requested!

  7. Oddly enough, King talks about RAGE in his new Kindle Single called “Guns” that was just published this morning:

  8. I knew I had read this, but I struggled to remember which one it was as it was so long ago!

    I’m going to re-read the Bachman Books, seeing as I’m not reading anything at the moment. I remember Thinner being the worst, and Roadwork being my favourite.

    I think the decision to unpublish Rage is a bit daft personally.

    • Well, like I said – I don’t necessarily agree with it (because I do think it’s probably one of the most important things he’s written), but I can understand why he did it.

  9. It is hard to figure out what subjects it is safe to write about nowadays. It is easy to go too far in the name of free speech, or to shock your readers, or make them think.

  10. I think I might have a digital copy of this. . . but I’ll have to check. I also think you should read everything Stephen King you can find because even if it’s controversial, he is right on with his stuff!

  11. I loved this book as a teen. I related to Charlie. No, not for the violence (but oh, I could see how he got pushed that far, I so could. Still can.) But for the lengths he went to. For the catharsis he was able to get. As a bullied teen, I related. So much.

    I like reading/watching things where people are at the edge and then just go over. I find it fascinating, how far people will go, what they will do when they’re pushed too far.

    I get why it was pulled. Not only for the violence – but because it was true. The kids were real. The scenario was real. Everything about it was. And when things are too real – people get scared.

    • I think it’s sad that so many kids are told “you’re just a kid, you DON’T KNOW!” which is what leads to the sorts of things talked about in this. Yes, you DO know. And it’s difficult, and it’s not fun, and it really just sucks. And I don’t understand the adults to refuse to acknowledge how very much is sucks to be a teenager. Life wasn’t perfect then, and I won’t ever lie to my kids and tell them that it’ll be easy because it isn’t. I will, however, do everything I can to listen and help them – as much as they’ll let me.

  12. I also totally wondered that about Joe, if he was real or not. But then I figured that he basically has to be real, or people probably would have been like, “Um, hey, Charlie, who’s this Joe person you keep talking about?”

    • I’m not kidding when I say that I wonder it every time I read it. I always think that maybe there’s A CLUE that I missed, and THIS IS THE TIME I’LL FIND IT!

      • It would make total sense for Charlie to have an imaginary(-ish) friend. But then I’m like, there are so many plot points that make it necessary for him to be both real and Charlie’s friend.. so THEY would also have to be imaginary. And then also he was at Carol Granger’s party, so wouldn’t she have at least seemed confused when he talked about Joe? (And I can’t for the life of me remember his last name, eff.)

  13. Totally going to look for this book now.

Trackbacks

Comments make us happy. Leave lots of comments. Just don't be a snapebag or you'll face the wrath of dodisharkicorn and your comment will be deleted. Or we'll make fun of you. Or both. Probably both.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,037 other followers

%d bloggers like this: