“It was more the premonition of a scent than the scent itself.”

by sj

perfumePatrick Süskind’s Perfume: The Story of a Murderer is one of those books that I love, but have a difficult time putting into words WHY EXACTLY I love it.

This book tackles very serious (and disturbing) subject matter, but manages to not take itself too seriously at the same time. Don’t take that for me saying this book could ever be considered lighthearted, though. And really, every time I read it (and, oh man – I’ve read this one so very many times) I still find myself with a swiftly beating heart and sometimes short of breath…I may even shed a tear or two (okay, I totally do – don’t judge).

I laugh at things like this:

FATHER TERRIER was an educated man. He had not merely studied theology, but had read the philosophers as well, and had dabbled with botany and alchemy on the side. He had a rather high opinion of his own critical faculties. To be sure, he would never go so far as some-who questioned the miracles, the oracles, the very truth of Holy Scripture-even though the biblical texts could not, strictly speaking, be explained by reason alone, indeed often directly contradicted it. He preferred not to meddle with such problems, they were too discomfiting for him and would only land him in the most agonizing insecurity and disquiet, whereas to make use of one’s reason one truly needed both security and quiet.

And this:

By spreading the semen of bulls over various grasses, he attempted to produce a milk-yielding animal-vegetable hybrid, a sort of udder flower. After initial successes that enabled him to produce a cheese from his milk grass-described by the Academy of Sciences of Lyon as “tasting of goat, though slightly bitter”— he had to abandon his experiments because of the enormous cost of spewing bull semen by the hundreds of quarts across his fields.

But then…but then we really get to know our main character (he’s not a protagonist, and is really a fairly despicable human), Grenouille, and even though amusing little asides are happening all around us, we can’t allow ourselves to enjoy them, or even notice them.  They’re there, but the true horror of what we’re seeing/reading/experiencing just…takes no quarter.

Grenouille is a character that you WANT to feel sympathy for, from the very first pages.  He’s an orphan whose mother was beheaded for attempting to kill her newborn son (and he wasn’t the first she would have thrown out with the fish heads).  He’s abandoned by wet nurses and the church, and later is sold into a form of bondage – it’s the kind of backstory that leaves you WANTING to feel some sort of compassion for a character, but you just can’t.  You can’t.

Or, I can’t.

Which is one of the reasons I have such a difficult time qualifying my complete adoration for this book.  With a main character that I CAN. NOT. STAND. I somehow still manage to continue to come back to this book.  I guess that’s why I find it so successful?  Somehow, even though I know going in that I’m going to cringe and (figuratively) cover my eyes with my fingers each time I read…I keep reading.  And reading.  And reading again.

This book is powerful.  And beautiful.  And creepy.  And amazing.

Read it.

YoRWtFIW

9 Comments to ““It was more the premonition of a scent than the scent itself.””

  1. Goddammit, I had written quite a lengthy comment but then my phone crashed before I had a chance to submit it and now it’s gone. Stupid Samsung.

    And now I can’t really remember what I wrote, which immediately makes it feel much more profound and important.

  2. But regardless of what I said in my lost comment, do read this book. I’m somewhat hyperosmic myself so I can quite easily see the world through his eyes (or nostrils). But, just as you said, I cannot sympathise with him. Not even a little bit. Which makes the book a strange one, but not less compelling.

    So do read it.

  3. This one is due for a re-read, I think. Your reaction to it is a lot like mine to Silverberg’s BOOK OF SKULLS. I hated the four protagonists and wished them ill through the whole novel but it was so fascinating watching these asshats do what they did and react as they did to the story and each other that I just really felt kind of icky for liking the book so much.

    But that’s probably a sign of art, at a high level. I recall being completely creeped out by Grenouille but I was so freaking fascinated by him I could not look away. And yes, he’s even creepier now that I’ve seen him portrayed on film by Ben Whitshaw, who captured his odiousness and his weird charm perfectly. I know SJ is not a fan of the film but I found it very vivid and daring and just as hard to look away from as the book.

    • TO BE FAIR, I have refused to watch the movie, so have zero opinion. This is one that I really don’t want to have my thoughts/feelings/memories/impressions sullied with a less than stellar adaptation.

  4. This has been on my to-read list forever! Hopefully this post and everyone’s praise will give me the kick in the pants I need to finally read it.

  5. You had me at the title. Now I have to do a post called; It was more the threat of a fart than the fart itself…

  6. I loved this book. Haven’t read it in years. I either didn’t know or blocked the fact that there’s a movie. I can’t imagine how you’d tell this story using a visual medium without constant narration. But yes, do read, anyone who hasn’t. Very well done.

Comments make us happy. Leave lots of comments. Just don't be a snapebag or you'll face the wrath of dodisharkicorn and your comment will be deleted. Or we'll make fun of you. Or both. Probably both.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,041 other followers

%d bloggers like this: